View source for Heritage Con Con

'''Don’t Be Fooled by Article V Conventions'''
<br>February 10, 2011 

The idea that there might be a simple fix to all our problems has seduced many thoughtful and well-intentioned men and women over the ages. If only we could do this, then all would be well.

We stand with our persevering friends and allies.  But let’s not be fooled.  By the very nature of man and the imperfection of politics, there are no silver bullets.

Such is the case with the proposal to hold an Article V constitutional amendments convention.  A perennial question in American history, it seems on its face to be a simple suggestion to deploy a forgotten option to bring about the changes we seek.

In the course of our work advising state and federal lawmakers and conservative allies across the country, we have been giving this issue close attention and study.  Along with Trent England, the director of constitutional studies at the Evergreen Freedom Foundation, I’ve written our assessment of the meaning and status of Article V as part of our Constitution Guidance for Lawmakers series.  Stemming from that analysis, and taking into consideration the circumstances under which we are now operating, we have come to the conclusion that '''''an Article V convention is not the answer to our problems'''''.<ref>Emphasis added.</ref>  The lack of precedent, extensive unknowns, and considerable risks of an Article V amendments convention should bring sober pause to advocates of legitimate constitutional reform contemplating this avenue.  We are not prepared to encourage state governments at this time to apply to Congress to call an amendments convention.

This should come as no surprise. ... ''[http://dailysignal.com/2011/02/10/dont-be-fooled-by-article-v-conventions/ read the remainder of the article here]
==References==
<references/>
[[category:ConCon]]