Difference between revisions of "Nominees Supreme Court"

From Phyllis Schlafly Eagles
Jump to: navigation, search
(Tier one candidates (13))
(Tier one candidates (13): add link)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
|Raymond Kethledge || US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit  || 50 (in Dec.) || refused to join a concurring opinion by conservative Judge Boggs that sought to strengthen the Second Amendment by establishing a "strict scrutiny" standard of review for laws that infringe on it.  ''Tyler v. Hillsdale Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't'', 837 F.3d 678, 702 (6th Cir. 2016) (Boggs, J., concurring).
 
|Raymond Kethledge || US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit  || 50 (in Dec.) || refused to join a concurring opinion by conservative Judge Boggs that sought to strengthen the Second Amendment by establishing a "strict scrutiny" standard of review for laws that infringe on it.  ''Tyler v. Hillsdale Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't'', 837 F.3d 678, 702 (6th Cir. 2016) (Boggs, J., concurring).
 
|-
 
|-
|Joan Larsen || Michigan Supreme Court || 47 || a feminist faculty member at a liberal law school, the University of Michigan [https://www.law.umich.edu/FacultyBio/Pages/FacultyBio.aspx?FacID=jllarsen], who is unqualified for the nomination, but may be pushed as a former Scalia clerk.  However, she lacks a strong sponsor and thinks there is sexism in law, so she is almost certainly '''not pro-life'''.
+
|Joan Larsen || Michigan Supreme Court || 47 || a feminist faculty member at a liberal law school, the University of Michigan [https://www.law.umich.edu/FacultyBio/Pages/FacultyBio.aspx?FacID=jllarsen], who is unqualified for the nomination, but may be pushed as a former Scalia clerk.  However, she lacks a strong sponsor and [https://www.michigan.gov/documents/mwc/Minutes_April_18_2016_532283_7.pdf asserted that there is sexism in law], so she is almost certainly '''not pro-life'''.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Sen. Mike Lee || Senator R-Utah  || 45 || strong pro-life record, but a senator has not been picked directly for the U.S. Supreme Court in 79 years (Hugo Black, nominated by FDR)
 
|Sen. Mike Lee || Senator R-Utah  || 45 || strong pro-life record, but a senator has not been picked directly for the U.S. Supreme Court in 79 years (Hugo Black, nominated by FDR)

Revision as of 11:59, 11 December 2016

Here are the 21 candidates on Trump's list for nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court, in order to fill the vacancy of Justice Antonin Scalia:

Tier one candidates (13)

candidate current position age comments
Charles T. Canady Florida supreme court 62 is pro-life, as a former congressman who coined the expression "partial-birth abortion" in sponsoring the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act; he twice properly rejected an unjustified attempt by a minor to have an abortion without first notifying her parents as required by Florida law
Steven Colloton US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 53 not pro-life, he wrote that courts should defer to the "professional judgment" of abortionists, and he also ruled twice in favor of the pro-abortion side. He is being pushed by Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, which will hold hearings on the nomination, and by the Federalist Society
Allison Eid Colorado Supreme Court 51 former clerk for Clarence Thomas, had an opportunity to stand up for the unborn in an abortion case but failed to speak out about the issue; she also lacks a strong sponsor
Neil Gorsuch US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 49 not pro-life, he is a big supporter granting special rights to men who say they have a female general identity. He mandated civil rights for "gender identity" in 2009 by adopting a Ninth Circuit opinion by the liberal Judge Reinhardt, which held the federal law called "Title VII" protects discrimination against gender identity. Kaslt v. Maricopa County Cmty. College Dist., 325 Fed. Appx. 492 (9th Cir. 2009). At the time virtually every other circuit rejected this liberal view. More recently Judge Gorsuch expressed his support for referring to biological men as women.
Raymond Gruender US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 53 has a strong pro-life record, but lacks a strong sponsor in the Trump transition or on the Senate Judiciary Committee
Thomas Hardiman US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 51 Two of Judge Hardiman's decisions have been reconsidered by the U.S. Supreme Court and both were affirmed. In a third case, Barkes v. First Correctional Medical, 766 F.3d 307 (3d Cir. 2014), Hardiman dissented and subsequently the Supreme Court unanimously agreed with Judge Hardiman's dissent, and reversed the decision in Taylor v. Barkes, 135 S. Ct. 2042 (2015). He lacks a powerful sponsor but could emerge as a compromise, David Souter-like stealth pick.
Raymond Kethledge US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 50 (in Dec.) refused to join a concurring opinion by conservative Judge Boggs that sought to strengthen the Second Amendment by establishing a "strict scrutiny" standard of review for laws that infringe on it. Tyler v. Hillsdale Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 837 F.3d 678, 702 (6th Cir. 2016) (Boggs, J., concurring).
Joan Larsen Michigan Supreme Court 47 a feminist faculty member at a liberal law school, the University of Michigan [1], who is unqualified for the nomination, but may be pushed as a former Scalia clerk. However, she lacks a strong sponsor and asserted that there is sexism in law, so she is almost certainly not pro-life.
Sen. Mike Lee Senator R-Utah 45 strong pro-life record, but a senator has not been picked directly for the U.S. Supreme Court in 79 years (Hugo Black, nominated by FDR)
Thomas Lee Utah Supreme Court 52 could become a consensus pick; his writings emphasize originalism and are considered most like Justice Scalia
William Pryor US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 54 prosecuted Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore for an alleged ethics violation due to having the Ten Commandments on display; Pryor was barely confirmed for his current position, by a vote of only 53-45 with Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski abstaining
Diane Sykes US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 59 (in Dec.) not pro-life, she ruled in favor of Planned Parenthood in blocking an Indiana law that attempted to cut off funding to it under the Medicaid law. Planned Parenthood of Ind., Inc. v. Comm'r of the Ind. State Dep't of Health, 699 F.3d 962 (7th Cir. 2012).[2] Was confirmed for her current position by a divisive vote of 70-27
Don Willett Texas Supreme Court 50 appears to be conservative but lacks a strong sponsor, and does not appear to be a frontrunner

Tier two candidates (8)

These potential nominees are on Trump's list but are unlikely to be picked at this time for the reasons stated:

candidate current position age comments
Keith Blackwell Georgia supreme court 41 probably too young at this time to be appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court, and lacks a strong sponsor
Edward Mansfield Iowa Supreme Court wrote a controversial decision in favor of a right to fire a woman for being sexually attracted to her; Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman is from Iowa but appears to be pushing Steve Colloton instead
Federico Moreno Southern District of Florida unlikely pick from the position of a trial rather than appellate court judge
Margaret Ryan US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces 52 she wrote the recent decision that court-martialed a Marine for having a Bible verse displayed on her desk, which suggests a hostility or insensitivity by Ryan to religious beliefs
Amul Thapar Eastern District of Kentucky unlikely pick from the position of a trial rather than appellate court judge
David Stras Minnesota Supreme Court 42 probably too young at this time to be appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court, he is a former clerk for Justice Clarence Thomas but lacks a pro-life record
Timothy Tymkovich US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 60 held in favor of religious liberty in Hobby Lobby decision, but has a younger colleague (Neil Gorsuch) on the same court who seems more likely if Trump were to pick from this court
Robert Young Michigan Supreme Court 66 (in Jan.) unlikely due to age and lack of a strong sponsor