Difference between revisions of "Con Con"
From Phyllis Schlafly Eagles
(Created page with "The States being targeted by the promoters of a constitutional convention -- a "Con Con" or "Convention of States" -- for 2017 are: * Arizona * Colorado * Michigan * Minnesot...") |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* Virginia | * Virginia | ||
* Wisconsin | * Wisconsin | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Rescission == | ||
+ | |||
+ | States that have passed a Convention of States should rescind it. A recent example is the [[Delaware rescission|rescission by Delaware]] of all of its prior resolutions for a Con Con. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Only eight states have enacted resolutions for a Convention of States, some using language different from others. Each of these eight states should rescind its call: | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Alabama | ||
+ | *Alaska | ||
+ | *Florida | ||
+ | *Georgia | ||
+ | *Indiana | ||
+ | *Louisiana | ||
+ | *Oklahoma | ||
+ | *Tennessee | ||
+ | |||
[[category:ConCon]] | [[category:ConCon]] |
Revision as of 12:29, 25 December 2016
The States being targeted by the promoters of a constitutional convention -- a "Con Con" or "Convention of States" -- for 2017 are:
- Arizona
- Colorado
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Montana
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Texas
- Utah
- Virginia
- Wisconsin
Rescission
States that have passed a Convention of States should rescind it. A recent example is the rescission by Delaware of all of its prior resolutions for a Con Con.
Only eight states have enacted resolutions for a Convention of States, some using language different from others. Each of these eight states should rescind its call:
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Florida
- Georgia
- Indiana
- Louisiana
- Oklahoma
- Tennessee