Difference between revisions of "Best arguments 2017"
From Phyllis Schlafly Eagles
(fiscal note needed) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*require a fiscal note, which is billions of dollars in lost entitlements to states | *require a fiscal note, which is billions of dollars in lost entitlements to states | ||
*Justice Scalia called this proposal for an Article V convention a "horrible idea" at a public event less than a year before he passed away. | *Justice Scalia called this proposal for an Article V convention a "horrible idea" at a public event less than a year before he passed away. | ||
− | *Phyllis Schlafly completely opposed a Con Con and Convention of States. | + | *Phyllis Schlafly completely opposed a Con Con and Convention of States, and all variations on the concept. |
+ | |||
*a vote for a Convention of States would be a vote against the conservative Republican national platform, which emphatically rejected this. | *a vote for a Convention of States would be a vote against the conservative Republican national platform, which emphatically rejected this. | ||
*a vote for a Convention of States would enable liberals to repeal the Electoral College. | *a vote for a Convention of States would enable liberals to repeal the Electoral College. |
Latest revision as of 19:32, 25 December 2016
Here are several of the best arguments against a Convention of States, to defeat the enemies of the Constitution who seek a constitutional convention to change it:
- require a fiscal note, which is billions of dollars in lost entitlements to states
- Justice Scalia called this proposal for an Article V convention a "horrible idea" at a public event less than a year before he passed away.
- Phyllis Schlafly completely opposed a Con Con and Convention of States, and all variations on the concept.
- a vote for a Convention of States would be a vote against the conservative Republican national platform, which emphatically rejected this.
- a vote for a Convention of States would enable liberals to repeal the Electoral College.
- a vote for a Convention of States would open the door to repealing the Second Amendment.
- a vote for a Convention of States would facilitate a new constitutional right to taxpayer-funded abortion.
- only Congress calls an Article V convention, and states should not be giving Congress more power.
- even supporters of a Convention of States have admitted that a a runaway convention could result.
- supporters of a Convention of States hide the secret agenda of their donors.