Difference between revisions of "Con Con"
From Phyllis Schlafly Eagles
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Rescission == | == Rescission == | ||
| − | States that have passed a Convention of States should rescind it. A recent example is the [[Delaware rescission|rescission by Delaware]] of all of its prior resolutions for a Con Con. | + | States that have passed a Convention of States should rescind it. A recent example is the [[Delaware rescission|rescission by Delaware]] of all of its prior resolutions for a Con Con. Here are some efforts at [[rescission 2017]]. |
Only eight states have enacted resolutions for a Convention of States, some using language different from others. Each of these eight states should rescind its call: | Only eight states have enacted resolutions for a Convention of States, some using language different from others. Each of these eight states should rescind its call: | ||
Revision as of 20:51, 26 December 2016
The States being targeted by the promoters of a constitutional convention -- a "Con Con" or "Convention of States" -- for 2017 are:
- Arizona
- Colorado
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Montana
- South Carolina
- South Dakota - COS had three paid lobbyists there in 2016
- Texas
- Utah
- Virginia - Convention of States will lobby the Legislature on January 16 (called "Lee and Jackson Day" there)
- Wisconsin
Rescission
States that have passed a Convention of States should rescind it. A recent example is the rescission by Delaware of all of its prior resolutions for a Con Con. Here are some efforts at rescission 2017.
Only eight states have enacted resolutions for a Convention of States, some using language different from others. Each of these eight states should rescind its call:
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Florida
- Georgia
- Indiana
- Louisiana
- Oklahoma
- Tennessee
